Y Media- The biggest South Asian Media House|Tuesday, September 26, 2017
You are here: Home » Canada » Regional Councillor John Sprovieri APOLOGISES – When I referred to “White Values”, I was referring to “Canadian Values”
  • Follow Us!

Regional Councillor John Sprovieri APOLOGISES – When I referred to “White Values”, I was referring to “Canadian Values” 

To the City of Brampton, my colleagues and my fellow Canadians,

I wish to discuss my recent comments regarding values as reported in
the media. I have, with the wisdom that comes with hindsight and
somber reflection, realized that I owe an apology for a confusing e-mail
exchange with a constituent.

In my haste to defend my friends, colleagues, city employees, and
those hired to bring their expertise and skills to the City of Brampton
to help a bigger and better city for the future of all our residents, I
choose my words poorly, and my comments did not reflect my
intended meaning when I wrote that email. My intention was to make
a point about Democratic values and Freedoms, but in so doing, I
committed the very same error that I was rallying against. In
categorizing people on the basis of Color, and in giving recognition to
only one Color, it was improper.

I want to make myself very clear on this point: when I referred to
“White Values”, I was referring to “Canadian Values” and was
applauding Canada’s commitment to build a nation of equity, peace,
democracy and prosperity. I was addressing how fortunate we all are
to live in a country that has adopted great values such as

multiculturalism, diversity, freedom of Religion and freedom of
speech. Being Canadian is a source of great pride for me. In
expressing that pride, it was not my intention to marginalize or ignore
the contributions of people of all origins. My intention to highlight
Canadian values of Inclusiveness, Democracy, and Freedom was lost
as result.

In my haste to defend those under attack, I failed to include all those
people for whom I have great respect, appreciation and admiration. In
my zeal, I let my passion cloud my judgment and colour my words.

I understand that Canadian Values, Morals and Ideals, are not based
on color, and I recognize it was unfair to phrase my comments in that
manner. This oversight was not a deliberate slight. I reacted too
quickly, and failed to appreciate how my words would be interpreted
outside of the context in which they were written.

Obviously, freedom, equity and the desire to live in peace and
harmony for the prosperity of all, are not “White Values” per se.
Obviously, it wasn’t “Only White People” that built this great nation, nor
was it “Only White People” that have fought to defend it. I realize that  my words did not pay homage to all of the people, of all origins, that have served our country, at home and abroad, or the people of all
origins who continue to safe guard our most important ideals. To all of
those people, I am forever indebted for my freedoms and my liberties.

I regret that I lost sight of my position as a public servant, of my duty to
speak on behalf of my constituents. It behooves me to do better; to
remember the privileges and responsibilities afforded me as a member
of Council. It is my duty to reflect the values of the whole city, and in
fact this whole nation. It was my duty to ensure my words
acknowledged all people who helped build this great nation. In
highlighting only certain contributions, as specific as it was to a
particular line of communication, I neglected that duty.

And I apologize for that.

I want to thank all of the people who reached out with messages of
support and understanding for the underlying message I was trying to
convey. While my original comments were limited in their scope, I will
forever appreciate the country that welcomed my family in 1956 and I
was overwhelmed by the number of people who share in that sense of
gratitude.

I hope that in issuing this apology, we can all move forward, and work
together for to the betterment of all citizens, to build a free, peaceful,
democratic, and prosperous city.

Sincerely yours,

John Sprovieri

Related posts: